Time to Put the S(ocial) S(ecurity) Back Into DWP?

Isn’t interesting how ‘Words’ can mean So very much?!

John Turner demonstrates how this works in practice –

“Perhaps, changing the name to the Department for Work, Pensions and Social Security would be a small contribution towards changing attitudes towards people on sickness benefits (and lone parents on benefits not requiring them to seek work)”

The ramblings of a former DWP Civil Servant ...

There is something vaguely Orwellian and misleading about the Department for Work and Pensions’ title.  The title would seem to suggest that you are either you are fit for work or on a State Pension.

I can well imagine the average voter, with no experience of receiving social security, assuming that if you do not fit into either the work or pensions group then you must, in some way, be playing the system.  There are, after all, some people around who still talk about the Social, the DSS and/or even the DHSS.

Perhaps, changing the name to the Department for Work, Pensions and Social Security would be a small contribution towards changing attitudes towards people on sickness benefits (and lone parents on benefits not requiring them to seek work)?  And, may be we could also resurrect the original Jobcentre Plus Mission Statement:

Help for those who can work and support…

View original post 4 more words

Advertisements

One thought on “Time to Put the S(ocial) S(ecurity) Back Into DWP?

  1. Pingback: Time to Put the S(ocial) S(ecurity) Back Into D...

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s